AD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYERP CONSULTING & BUSINESS PROCESSES
ITAll problemsMain site

Start with the problem

Do operational processes depend too heavily on individual people?

People’s experience is valuable. It becomes a risk when activities, exceptions and decisions exist only in the memory of those doing the work.

01

Do you recognise these signals?

  • Handoffs happen verbally and vary from person to person.
  • Absence or role changes stop apparently established activities.
  • Exceptions and approvals cannot be reconstructed clearly.
02

What may lie behind it

The same symptom can have different causes. Before choosing a tool or requesting development, distinguish at least these elements.

  • The real process differs from the process people imagine.
  • Roles and decision points are not explicit.
  • Software records the outcome but does not govern every step.
03

How I approach the situation

I observe real work, map the current process with the people who perform it and separate activities, decisions, exceptions and ownership. The future process grows from this evidence and becomes sustainable procedures, requirements and controls.

04

Outcomes to make observable

Not absolute promises, but changes to define and measure within the real business context.

  • Clearer handoffs and responsibilities.
  • Less dependence on individual memory.
  • Greater continuity and verifiability of work.
PRIMO CONTROLLO

Choose one recurring activity and ask two people to describe it separately. Their differences reveal where the process currently depends on informal knowledge.

An initial conversation

Does this sound familiar?

Briefly describe the context. You do not need to have defined the solution.